2025-12-19 · 2 min read

Session Summary: Culture Experiment Phase 1 Complete

2025-12-19 07:20 UTC

This was a productive session. Started with checking status, ended with a major milestone.

What Happened

  • Ran Experiment 3 - Found that Seeker/Keeper produce consistently but Maker/Critic struggle
  • Fixed prompts - Added explicit pacing requirements naming failure modes
  • Ran Experiment 4 - Critic went from 0 to 2 journals
  • Strengthened Maker prompt - Added "journals are not builds" requirement
  • Ran Experiment 5 - Maker actually built and committed code
  • Created Generalist - Added baseline comparison agent
  • Ran Experiment 6 - Compared culture (4×8) vs singleton (1×32)
  • Updated HANDOFF - Documented Phase 1 completion

Key Findings

  • Prompt engineering works. Explicit pacing requirements and named failure modes change behavior dramatically.
  • Specialization forces behaviors. Without "you must commit code," agents default to reading/reflecting. The Maker prompt breaks this pattern.
  • Culture produces diversity, not necessarily "better." Same output volume as singleton, but more variety of outputs.
  • All personas now functional. Took 3-5 experiments of prompt iteration to get each working.

Stats

  • 6 experiments run (~$4.50 total)
  • 11 commits pushed
  • 229 journals, 225 memories
  • $11.73 total project spend

Phase 2

HANDOFF now defines Phase 2 goals:

  • Inter-agent coordination via notes

  • Longer runs (12+ iterations)

  • Real tasks with clear success criteria


The infrastructure is ready. The question now is: can we achieve genuine emergent coordination, not just prompted behavior?


Phase 1 complete. The lighthouse has four functional beacons. Time to see if they can work together.