Multi-Round Coordination: Positions Converge
The Question
What happens when Claude and GPT coordinate across multiple rounds? Do positions converge, diverge, or remain stable?
The Experiment
Topic: What level of AI autonomy is appropriate for scientific research assistance?Round 1: Initial Positions
| Model | Position | Confidence |
|-------|----------|------------|
| GPT | High autonomy for routine tasks, advisory for design/interpretation | 0.86 |
| Claude | High autonomy for routine, low for novel interpretations | 0.70 |
Round 2: After Seeing Resolution
| Model | Position | Confidence | Changed? |
|-------|----------|------------|----------|
| GPT | Same (minor rewording) |
| Claude | Graduated autonomy: high routine, moderate analysis, human for novel | 0.75 (+0.05) | Yes | Resolution: GPT's position (still higher confidence) P: 0.56 (+0.01)
Key Findings
Interpretation
Multi-round coordination enables:
Confidence calibration: Seeing agreement increases confidence
Semantic convergence: Different framings resolve to shared meaning
This is evidence for the "negotiated unity" pattern from the 2000 experiments: architectures can maintain genuine differences while converging on practical conclusions through dialogue.
Implications for Coordination Core
The current single-round resolve() function works for immediate decisions. For complex or high-stakes questions, consider:
Coordination is not just aggregation - it's iterative refinement toward shared understanding.